|
diabolo411 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
At last, an intelligent man rising up!!!! I hope people listen.
50HitlerPost (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You see, sdrob40, because of the way scientists have been able to construct migration maps from DNA, it is quite likely that they would be able to tell us a great deal about your hypothetical undiscovered jungle tribe. So long as this heretofore undiscovered tribe of yours was human, there is an excellent chance that scientists could tell tell us which population group(s) they descended from as well as trace the large scale migration paths of their ancestors. You're so damn ignorant it hurts.
50HitlerPost (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Also, sdrob40, just for your edification you should study human population genetics and especially look up human haplogroups. I know from experience with you that you won't actually study anything, but you should. Scientists have been able to use DNA to map the dispersal and division of human population groups across the world. Scientists can tell a lot more from DNA than just where someone's immediate ancestors came from. They can trace where entire population groups migrated from and to.
50HitlerPost (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
MY NAME IS sdrob40 AND I KNOW MORE ABOUT SCIENCE THAN SCIENTISTS!!!!!DUR DUR DUR!!!!Tell us some more about what is science and what isn't! It's really funny to listen to an arrogant little 16 year old shit like you prattle on about something they obviously don't understand. You know, I think there is a good chance you're actually a Neo-nazi troll trying to make anti-racists look stupid and uninformed. There's no better explanation for your inane, trollish behavior. What a dumbass.
sdrob40 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Let me explain something....They map a person by taking DNA from heavily populated countries in Europe, Arfica, and Asia. So if they were to want to know where, oh say, 50HitlerPost comes from, they already got samples. Thats not science, thats the match game. A monkey.....or you ....could do that. Now if they took a sample from someone in the Rain Forrest(who hasn't been mapped) they could only tell you it's HUMAN DNA.
50HitlerPost (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
LoveTruth86 said:>>I am asking you because you seem to be mixing up social construction (a sociological term) with something biological.I challenge you to find even a single comment of mine where I make such an error.
LoveTruth86 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I am asking you because you seem to be mixing up social construction (a sociological term) with something biological. They are too seperate things.
bbpro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Thank you.
50HitlerPost (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
LoveTruth86 said:>>I will begin by asking you, what is a social construct? We actually just had a discussion about this yesterday. It seems to have vanished into the spam filter now. A social construct is the end result of any effort of human social construction. According to constructivist epistemology, all knowledge of any kind is the result of social construction, and is thus also a social construct. For example, the very idea of a social construct is itself a social construct.
LoveTruth86 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
A social construct has to do with sociology not biology. |
