|
elijahtc (August 26, 2008 at 1:02 pm)
the guy should have said 10 years early too
therealCStonebraker (August 6, 2008 at 2:55 am)
1993?
therealCStonebraker (August 6, 2008 at 2:55 am)
no, you suck dog balls.obviously you don't have a good taste in cinema. the 2003 version was not good.the 208 version was excellent and i think its better than Iron Man. so anyone reading this comment, go see the movie, don't listen to idiots that like to tarnish a good film's reputation.
JerrimeWilliams30 (August 2, 2008 at 11:11 pm)
@freakoworld! EVERYONE? DON'T BELIEVE THIS FIGURE: freakoworld! You must was half asleep while watching "The Incredible Hulk!" That movie is the best movie of the summer!
dirtyelk1 (July 26, 2008 at 9:38 pm)
your a fucking idiot,this is a great movie, just has good has ironman, but i bet u like mama mia,
imakehomevideos (July 22, 2008 at 7:10 pm)
i like this movie
freakoworld (July 18, 2008 at 6:26 pm)
Don't go see this movie. IT SUCKED DOG BALLS. The 2003 hulk had more intense action scenes although it looked like shrek and even moved like shrek. Fellas, think long and hard before you do the next hulk...peace.
zbias (July 18, 2008 at 3:37 pm)
you mean 2003 :)
Dmaine23T (July 16, 2008 at 5:56 am)
1993??????you are 10 years late!you mean mean 1003
shue3303 (July 16, 2008 at 3:33 am)
I didn't like the movie at all - it wasn't very good. I really liked the first one actually. |
